Sunday, February 19, 2012

Response to Fausto-Sterling and Myhre


Both of the readings this week sought to blur the distinctions between male and female, while also educating the reader about the histories and conflicts of the “in-between” areas.  I found the Myhre reading perhaps the most interesting, because it gave a personal account of one person’s life, and the decisions she made.  Many of the points she raised were legitimate and revealing, such as the idea that it “takes work to look like a ‘woman’.”  I guess I have never really thought about it before in depth, but without any upkeep, men and women have the potential to look very similar, especially from certain angles.  The reading was also interesting because it is the first we’ve done from the perspective of someone who self-admittedly takes on the appearance and habits of the stereotypical feminist.  The stereotypical feminist has a very negative connotation, yet when explained through the personal experiences of someone like Myhre, it comes across as far more positive.
            The first two chapters of Fausto-Sterling’s Sexing the Body, I found them very educational.  For example, I knew very little about the development of certain phrases that are not quite common in society and women’s studies, and the distinctions between them all were new to me.  In particular, I found the Kinsey scale very interesting.  Although it doesn’t fit people with organs from both sexes as well, the idea that society can cause individuals to slide on the scale, based on what they’re interested in or personal preferences is thought provoking.  I also enjoyed the connection to Plato’s Greece, since I just finished a class where we read Plato’s Symposium, which talks about different ideas of love.  Several of the speeches at the dinner party revolve around solely male love, which was considered above heterosexual couplings.  The transition from those ideas to the ones present in popular culture today is fascinating.

No comments:

Post a Comment