In
the New Yorker article “The Score: How Childbirth Went Industrial”, Atul
Gawande looks at a case study of Elizabeth Rourke’s experience with childbirth
against the backdrop of the history of child-birthing procedures. There
are over 130 million births a year, and while many of them go well, there are
some that are doomed to have complications. Rourke avoided unnecessarily
procedures and labor inducing medications when she went into labor, but when
her baby got stuck facing sideways, she did not have many options and was
forced to have a Cesaerean section, or a C-section as it is commonly referred
to as today.
In
the midst of Rourke’s experiences, Gawande goes through the process of
childbirth, from the moment the mother’s pelvis enlarges in the first
trimester, to the change in the uterus during gestation, and the effacement of
the cervix. According to Gawande, the “transition phase”, which is the
considered the most intense phase, occurs when cervical dilation is between
seven to ten centimeters. As dilations reach a high intensity, the baby’s
head begins to emerge until the full baby is born and the umbilical cord is
cut.
While
this process may seem relatively simple, in spite of the pain, Gawande goes on
to talk about how many women used to and still do die from childbirth. In
fact, childbirth used to be the leading cause for deaths among women and
infants for many years due to complications, such as hemorrhage, infection, or
the “obstruction of labor” when the baby will not come out. In these
cases, abortion would most likely be necessary, but the abortion procedures
back in the day were very different among doctors and midwives. One procedure
included the use of a sharp instrument called a “crochet” that would
essentially crush the skull in an attempt to save the mother. Then there are
procedures, or maneuvers, that consist of pulling the baby out of the mother
from various angles and by various body parts. Gawande notes, however,
that survival rates vary among these maneuvers and do not guarantee
anything.
During
the 19th and 20th centuries, Cesarean sections,
obstetrical forceps, and antiseptics were used by many doctors, prompting women
to go to a hospital for childbirth rather than stay in the comfort of their own
home. Surprisingly, a study done by the New York Academy of Medicine
revealed that more women were dying from childbirth in the hospital than at
home, proving that maybe midwives were better suited for delivering than the
“renowned” doctors. In the aftermath of this study, doctors realized that
if they wanted to deliver babies, they would have to standardize their
practices to ensure safety.
Virginia
Apgar was a medical student who Gawande believes made this standardization
possible with the introduction of anesthesia and the Apgar Score. The
Apgar Score has been used since Virginia Apgar to rate the condition of a baby
when it is born on a scale of one to ten. If a baby is deemed as being a
ten, its condition is perfect. This is, according to Gawande, how childbirth
went industrial and how obstetrics changed the face of childbirth for the
better.
Henci
Goer, on the other hand, is very critical of Gawande’s article in regards to
obstetrics and the industrialization of childbirth. According to Goer,
Gawande is naïve to say that obstetrics have proved to be safer and a much
better practice than others in the medical field. Furthermore, Goer sees
Gawande’s takeaway message, which essentially makes the claim that C-sections
are safe and easy while natural childbirth is painful and dangerous, is
completely illogical and erroneous. Using evidence from different
studies, Goer shows that the immediate and potential future death rates from
childbirths have historically been lower when the mother was not in a hospital
setting and that a mother’s health and well-being might be in greater danger in
a hospital setting. Gawande does little to show the benefits for mothers
who choose not use obstetrics, yet makes the false assumption that women who do
are better off. Goer argues that childbirth, “has everything to do with
[the] caregiver’s philosophy and approach,” which sheds light on why Rourke’s
experience may have not have been ideal. Ultimately, Goer believes that a
C-section should not be considered the norm or routine procedure, as it is
stated by Gawande and experienced by Rourke.
No comments:
Post a Comment