Of all the readings from the
semester so far, the two selected chapters from Sex at Dawn were easily
among the most interesting for me.
The first chapter discusses the standard narrative of human sexual
evolution, which is the most commonly accepted theory for human sexual
evolution. The authors begin by
laying out that humans are extremely sexual creatures, and that both sexes
“certainly find pleasure” in sex, even though our biological sexes mean that we
look for different things in sex and relationships (47). The chapter addresses initially the
differences between males and females when it comes to sexual libido, as well
as the reasons behind sexual relations for each sex. The authors then offer the four “major areas of research
that incorporate the most widely accepted assumptions” about the standard
narrative (48), which are: the relatively weak female libido, male parental
investment, sexual jealousy and paternity certainty, and extended receptivity
and concealed (or cryptic) ovulation.
However,
before getting into these four main topics for the chapter, Rayn and Jetha
outline the economics behind sex for both men and women. They suggest that the old logic of
standard evolutionary theory is based on the idea that “leaving a genetic
legacy is our sole purpose in life” (50).
The focus then turns to male and female roles in society. Historically and psychologically, men
have provided goods and services in exchange for “consistent sexual access” to
one female (49). They then look at
the idea of a “return on investment,” which basically means that each parent
wants their offspring to live and succeed, but the inputs depend on the
sex. For men, it is far easier for
them to want to sleep with a lot of women, while remaining close to one to
ensure that no other men jeopardize their “investment.” For women, they look for the right man
who will stay with them, provide the necessary things to survive, and help with
fatherly tasks during childhood.
Essentially, Rayn and Jetha say that women exchange their sexual
services for access to resources from men.
From
here, the chapter moves into the four main points, starting with the fact that
women have a significantly lesser libido when compared to men. Many studies have reportedly been done
that suggest women are far less inclined to jump into bed as readily as
men. The takeaway from the section
is that women are far less inclined to engage in casual sex. Secondly, the chapter focuses on male
parental investment, which basically says that men have an invested role in the
success of their offspring, once they find a woman that they “lay claim to”
(50). However, this idea also
encompasses the idea that women are more interested in quality over quantity
when it comes to sex partners, due to the high level of female investment. Most interestingly, theorists find that
the levels of male parental investment are much higher than with other
primates. This apparently leads to
both men and women competing for the other gender’s investment in sexual
selection, which is rare.
The
second to last section of the chapter concerns the “battle” between the sexes,
based on their best “economic” actions regarding sex and contributing to the
gender pool, while also ensuring the best for their offspring, which is looks
to the different types of jealously each sex feels with their partners. Men tend to feel more anxious about
sexual infidelity, while women tend to fear emotional infidelity, which is very
interesting to me in particular. Women are more worried about the emotional
stability of the relationship, because according to standard narrative, it is
the tie that keeps the man of her life providing her with the things she
needs. Men, on the other hand,
worry about sexual infidelity, because it can mean that they are providing for
a child that is not their own, which would be a huge waste of investment. The authors then lay out the ideal
goals for men and women. Men,
following this mixed strategy model, would ideally get a woman pregnant, and
continue to have as much casual sex as possible on the side while providing for
the original woman and ensuring she doesn’t sleep around. Women, on the other hand, would attempt
to extract a long-term commitment from a man to provide from her, but then
sneak out and sleep with other more sexually desirable men on the side. The
chapter concludes with a discussion concerning the fact that women are
basically the only mammals that don’t have an obvious sign showing when they
are the most fertile. There are
two theories that suggest why this is, but they don’t agree on much. One believes it is to keep men
interested and away from other partners due to the chance that she could always
be the most fertile, while the other theory suggests it is to confuse men such
that women could sleep with several men to protect her wellbeing. Either way, the chapter concludes by
saying that humans are extremely sexual creatures, and that the standard
narrative suggests that human sexual history is marked by deceit and confusion.
The
second chapter made a little bit less sense than me. From the title, it would appear that the chapter should
debunk the standard narrative, yet in my opinion, it does a poor job. Rayn and Jetha look to a few select
cultures that seem to operate in a different way than ours or any other
patriarchal society. First, they
look at the Mosuo, a tribe in China whose sexual history is markedly different
than any other. The women reach
maturity at 13, which allows them their own room to which any other male can
come on a given night, and the details are not spread later. Any offspring are cared for by the
adults of the entire culture, rather than forming the traditional
families. In some cases,
individuals have sex with hundreds of individuals, and they do not look on this
number with pride or shame in any sense.
The chapter also looks to another culture in which neither sex seems to
dominate, but instead “males and females complement one another” (133). Finally, the chapter ends with a
discussion on monogamy, and concludes by saying that it is a purely social
construct and that no other animal is absolutely monogamous, even though other
species have the illusion of being monogamous for certain periods of time. The human understanding of monogamy
does not exist elsewhere, and neither do socially constructed things such as “marriage,”
“mating,” and “love” (137).
No comments:
Post a Comment