Sunday, February 5, 2012

Summary of Douglas (Chpt. 1-3)


In first chapter of Enlightened Sexism, “Get the Girls”, Douglas discusses the shift in the early 1990’s from feminism to consumerism that redefined notions of power among women.  Feminist activism had not disappeared from popular culture by the early nineties, but it quickly became undermined when women were targeted as a “niche market” for consumerist profits.  Douglas points to 1992 as “The Year of Women”, in which women were more aware of their political power and influence.  Unfortunately, Beverly Hills 90210 was on the rise and capturing the minds of fantastical teens across the country.  Douglas believes that it was because of this petty-teenage drama that enlightened sexism emerged.  As teenage girls sat around their TVs mesmerized by a leisure class so distant from their own whose life was dependent on the glorification of beauty, fashion, sexuality, and having the perfect boyfriend, enlightened sexism was head to head with embedded feminism, warring over the new wave of consumerist culture. 
            Although there was some backlash to enlightened sexism, as expressed by the band Riot Grrrl and the magazine Sassy—both of which sought to positively and politically reclaim the term “girl”—enlightened sexism continued to flourish throughout the nineties thanks to Beverly Hills 90210 and shows alike.  The strong female leads, such as Rosanne and Murphy Brown, that had gained popularity were now dropping in ratings as the younger generation of “bitches” challenged their power with higher ratings.  This unfortunate shift towards enlightened sexism in the media turned many previous feminist gains upside down and continues to dominate our culture today.
           
Douglas’ second chapter, “Castration Anxiety”, explains how a new ideological understanding of women in power took root in the media, which put a politically active woman like crime-fighter Janet Reno next to supermodel Cindy Crawford and essentially said Crawford—the more beautiful and feminine woman of the two—is the one to envy.  Castration anxiety refers to men’s rationale that woman were allowed to have some power as long as they did not pose a threat to their own power.  Men did not want women to penetrate their spheres of influence, so instead of favoring woman with actual real world power, they gave power to the more beautiful and sexualized woman on screen. 
            A prime example of castration anxiety that Douglas uses is the Amy Fisher case.  At age seventeen, Fisher shot the wife of a man she met in an auto shop whom was also having an affair with her.  Fisher’s case blew up in the media, particularly when it was discovered that she worked for an escort service, turning the young girl into a poster child of feminism at its most extreme.  In a way, Fisher became an iconic threat, warning Americans what a woman caught medaling with her power could do.  

            “Warrior Women in Thongs”—Douglas’ third chapter—revolves around a trend in the nineties that tried to balance both strength and femininity/sexuality in a woman by turning her into media warrior.  Shows, such as Xena: The Warrior Princess and Buffy: The Vampire Slayer, put women in a mythological realm where they could explore what it was like to take on male characteristics while still maintaining what the media suggested womanhood meant.  Douglas argues that these realms offered women a space for exploration that the real world did not.  However, although Xena and Buffy reclaimed their power as women in these realms, they were also conducive to the same stereotypes that existed outside of them.  Xena might be able to kick butt in epic battle scene, but she would still cry over romance and her sexuality was often a source of trouble.  Charlie’s Angels: Full Throttle is another perfect example, including not just one warrior woman, but three.  The Angels were known for their combat skills in addition to their highly sexualized identities, which can be noted by just looking at their wardrobes.  The Angels had to compromise between their strength and their identity as women.  This compromise is what defined “warrior women in thongs” during the nineties.  As Douglas states: “Warrior women were both transgressive and conformist.  They fought like Jackie Chan but cried over romantic betrayal or injury done to others; they were physically dominating yet caring,” (99).  

No comments:

Post a Comment